ThisJust friendly banter, Ford Chevy type thing, stay cool bro
I never said that. I went back through all of my comments and no where did I say that.Phil, I believe all of your statements to be true, with the exception of the "all Glocks are 'junk" part.
"The toys they are."I never said that. I went back through all of my comments and no where did I say that.
Bul 1911's are such a great value, you will never be sorry you got one" I personally don't care for the Glocks"... or any polymer framed pistol I've tried.
Though I tried a couple, ( a 21 & a 22, + a 9mm conversion barrel for the 22) )
I tried to get to like them, shot them enough to discover. I'm a real-steel pistol lover.
Don't like polymer frames, or even like aluminum or alloy frames. ( though they seem acceptable on the Sigs I own )
I also tried a Walther PPS 2 , as another attempt to get familiar with polymer framed pistols.
Though it feels great in my hand, don't like shooting it very much.
I Sold my DW 9mm Guardian 'cause I didn't like it's "feel" or "balance", of it's aluminum frame.
Considered buying & building a real steel frame for it, instead I bought a Bul Cmdr. in 9mm,
which was what I wanted, & the Guardian was sold.
That's why I don't buy Glock. They feel like toys in the hand. When I did own polymer, I collected Springfields. I had quite a few actually. I had lots of others too but I actually collected Springfield. Long as it goes bang, it'll get you out of a jam. That's what they are for."The toys they are."
I have since corrected. To me toys are synonymous with items not to be taken seriously, i.e. it's junk. Correct, not your words though--I apologize for the wording misuse.
I've shot one, it was not bad. Fit my hand far better than my Glocks did, before I had a grip reduction done. I still favor the 17 over the 19, because the grip reduction feels better. I do carry the 19, but I'd prefer to carry the 17. The difference in the feel to me is because of the full size grip on the 17, the 19 has a shorter grip, and to me it feels a touch larger. Reason for carrying the 19 over the 17? Grip length is more than a full size 1911 because of the ridge (for lack of a better word) on the bottom of the Glock 17 mag, it prints bad for me. For the record I am somewhere around 5'8" depending on the day, and how sore my back is that day. I weigh approx 158# and of course small frame, small hands. !911's, and Hi Powers with slim grips are my favorites, and I do carry those time to time. Either pancake holster, or IWB. As I've said before, the gun I carry most is a satin nickel 442 with semi wadcutters in it. One of my favorite things about this group is the diversity of it. I also treasure the comradery of it. Stay safe all. God Bless the USA!Springfield plastics? A toy gun. Only shot one once though so... I got that going for my opinions
That's because it the man's version of a Glock.I've shot one, it was not bad. Fit my hand far better than my Glocks did, before I had a grip reduction done.
REEEALLY? Here I thought the 1911 held that title… in which the CZ was modeled after… pick a fight you can win…I hear hear on the internet that 4-pound Česká zbrojovka Uherský Brod guns are better than real combat & street proven as carry pistols anyway.
Idk, as far as toys go, I'd put one against a Glock any day of the week. Alas, I have neither.LOL. And sure, the best Croat pistol in the world is--wait for it--the one made by Croatian military. To prove it is a 'toy' (by your philosopy) it even tells you where to put your hand. Sorry, bub.
Says the Glock guy…And seriously, give up trolling for CZ/Springy on a 1911 forum. It is unbecoming...