Burk Cornelius
Regular guy
http://ipsc.okcgunclub.org/16scores/jan16/ipsc/index.html
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk 5.3
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk 5.3
I hope I wasn't running the Nook on that one. That damn thing was goofy yesterday.Chambers said:Per USPSA rules, they zeroed me on that stage since they didn't know the actual time.
I do, though.![]()
Should have been a reshoot then right?Chambers said:Per USPSA rules, they zeroed me on that stage since they didn't know the actual time.
I do, though.![]()
....Jason Grant said:Should have been a reshoot then right?
I love that movie!Micah_Rowe said:....
The match was overJason Grant said:I love that movie!
I was just considering the fact that if no time was taken..same as if the timer failed to work..it's a reshoot
Yes, the exact issue. This happens almost every match.Burk Cornelius said:I think this issue is the same thing John Bent wrote about in December. http://www.okcgunclub.org/electronic_scoring.html
The migration to electronic scoring has greatly improved the efficiency of our matches and overall accuracy of results since the results are no longer effected by transcribing once scoring is completed at the stage. Also, there is logic built into the software to catch the most common types of scoring errors and prevent them from being saved.
…can you feel it coming? …here it comes… BUT
It is vital that the results are reviewed at the time a stage is shot to insure that the correct information â€" such as the time â€" is accurate. This is a joint responsibility of the RO, scorekeeper, and the shooter. Once the results are saved and the match moves on, there is no paper trail to catch/correct an error.
During the match, an error would result in a re-shoot; after the match is over and we’re all sipping a beer at home reviewing results that isn’t possible.
USPSA rules, including 9.7.5, 9.7.6, and 9.7.7 and 9.11.2 speak to these issues. In a case such as an obviously impossible time is recorded and a re-shoot is not possible, the only remedy is to zero the shooter’s results. There is no provision to “take a guess at what it should’ve/might’ve beenâ€.
As a shooter, it’s a good idea to review your stage results with the scorekeeper at the time to shoot the stage to ensure that what is stored reflects what you did. That is the appropriate place to make corrections or get a reshoot, as appropriate.
I think that is EXACTLY when we should be deciding the final scores.Jason Grant said:I like the part about sipping a beer and reviewing results
I only drink with my old grandad.Matt Rigsby said:My score always improves after my good friend Jack Daniels comes by the house.