OKCGC 1.2.16 USPSA Results

Per USPSA rules, they zeroed me on that stage since they didn't know the actual time.

I do, though. :)
 
Chambers said:
Per USPSA rules, they zeroed me on that stage since they didn't know the actual time.
I do, though. :)
I hope I wasn't running the Nook on that one. That damn thing was goofy yesterday.
 
Zeroed a stage and finished 5th in Limited. That's semi-pro elephant dung right there

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk 5.3
 
Chambers said:
Per USPSA rules, they zeroed me on that stage since they didn't know the actual time.

I do, though. :)
Should have been a reshoot then right?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
FWIW, my comment was from before they zeroed your score. It showed that you shot it in 2.08 seconds or something!
 
Micah_Rowe said:
I love that movie!

I was just considering the fact that if no time was taken..same as if the timer failed to work..it's a reshoot
 
Jason Grant said:
I love that movie!
I was just considering the fact that if no time was taken..same as if the timer failed to work..it's a reshoot
The match was over
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    96.9 KB
I think this issue is the same thing John Bent wrote about in December. http://www.okcgunclub.org/electronic_scoring.html

The migration to electronic scoring has greatly improved the efficiency of our matches and overall accuracy of results since the results are no longer effected by transcribing once scoring is completed at the stage. Also, there is logic built into the software to catch the most common types of scoring errors and prevent them from being saved.

…can you feel it coming? …here it comes… BUT

It is vital that the results are reviewed at the time a stage is shot to insure that the correct information â€" such as the time â€" is accurate. This is a joint responsibility of the RO, scorekeeper, and the shooter. Once the results are saved and the match moves on, there is no paper trail to catch/correct an error.

During the match, an error would result in a re-shoot; after the match is over and we’re all sipping a beer at home reviewing results that isn’t possible.

USPSA rules, including 9.7.5, 9.7.6, and 9.7.7 and 9.11.2 speak to these issues. In a case such as an obviously impossible time is recorded and a re-shoot is not possible, the only remedy is to zero the shooter’s results. There is no provision to “take a guess at what it should’ve/might’ve been”.

As a shooter, it’s a good idea to review your stage results with the scorekeeper at the time to shoot the stage to ensure that what is stored reflects what you did. That is the appropriate place to make corrections or get a reshoot, as appropriate.
 
Burk Cornelius said:
I think this issue is the same thing John Bent wrote about in December. http://www.okcgunclub.org/electronic_scoring.html

The migration to electronic scoring has greatly improved the efficiency of our matches and overall accuracy of results since the results are no longer effected by transcribing once scoring is completed at the stage. Also, there is logic built into the software to catch the most common types of scoring errors and prevent them from being saved.


…can you feel it coming? …here it comes… BUT


It is vital that the results are reviewed at the time a stage is shot to insure that the correct information â€" such as the time â€" is accurate. This is a joint responsibility of the RO, scorekeeper, and the shooter. Once the results are saved and the match moves on, there is no paper trail to catch/correct an error.

During the match, an error would result in a re-shoot; after the match is over and we’re all sipping a beer at home reviewing results that isn’t possible.

USPSA rules, including 9.7.5, 9.7.6, and 9.7.7 and 9.11.2 speak to these issues. In a case such as an obviously impossible time is recorded and a re-shoot is not possible, the only remedy is to zero the shooter’s results. There is no provision to “take a guess at what it should’ve/might’ve been”.

As a shooter, it’s a good idea to review your stage results with the scorekeeper at the time to shoot the stage to ensure that what is stored reflects what you did. That is the appropriate place to make corrections or get a reshoot, as appropriate.
Yes, the exact issue. This happens almost every match.

You need to review your score each & every stage.

This isn't a problem with practiscore, this happened with pen & paper as well (Incorrect or incomplete scores).
 
I like the part about sipping a beer and reviewing results
 
Jason Grant said:
I like the part about sipping a beer and reviewing results
I think that is EXACTLY when we should be deciding the final scores.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk 5.3
 
My score always improves after my good friend Jack Daniels comes by the house.
 
Back
Top