Kind of a loaded question.
I avoid some for political reasons, some for quality reasons, some because they are overpriced and some because they don't have a feature set I like. I've sold a dozen 1911s over the years, some for the political and QC reasons. Also, for me, 1911 means .45s and 10mms. Yes, I have one in 9mm, but I prefer the larger bores in the 1911 pattern.
I'll give you my personal opinion, which may or may not be valid to the OP. First, if the price tag is bumping over $2K, I am not buying. I am going to pay the $3k+ to go take a builder class under a Master, like Bruce Piatt for example, and build exactly what I want under the guidance of said master.
The brands I will, and have bought in the last 10 years include Bul Armory, Ruger and Dan Wesson. Good feature sets, quality pistols and not anti-2A. Yes, I have a Kimber that has been remarkable, and it's even an Ultra, but I can't in good conscience suggest them. Yes, I've shot Tisas, but I can't, in good conscience tell anyone they will last long term and they do lack some finesse of the Bul in the budget space. S&W and Springfield arguably make some good (not great) pistols but I avoid them due to the political reasons. Colt, over-hyped emotion with the current production, but that does not mean they are bad, I just don't see a reason to leave the three I mentioned above that I have bought. Wilson is a premium brand, as is Les Baer and Nighthawk, a bit over-hyped and they fall into that category where, for me, I am taking the builder class.