USPSA RO Class in OKC

Checks payable to USPSA or ?

1. Terry Kendell
2. Jason Grant
3. Blaise Sanford
4. Julie Sanford
5. Stone Dudley
6. Grant Wood
7. Yolanda Wood
8. John Hensy
9. Bryan Hoover
10. Robaire Pullicar jr
11. Robaire Pullicar SR
12. Jamie Meyer
13. Monty Montgomery
14. Michael Harrell
15. Kellye Dyche Jr
16. Jeff Turner
17. Steve McGinley
 
Bryan Hoover said:
Make checks payable to Bryan Hoover. I will issue one check to USPSA.
Correct. The uspsa fee does not cover instructor hotel & food expenses. They are paid seperately by the coordinator (Bryan). I've done the legwork to get everything set up, but I've asked Bryan to take over from here since I will not be available the days of the class.
 
1. Terry Kendell
2. Jason Grant
3. Blaise Sanford
4. Julie Sanford
5. Stone Dudley
6. Grant Wood
7. Yolanda Wood
8. John Hensy
9. Bryan Hoover
10. Robaire Pullicar jr
11. Robaire Pullicar SR
12. Jamie Meyer
13. Monty Montgomery
14. Michael Harrell
15. Kellye Dyche Jr
16. Jeff Turner
17. Steve McGinley
18. Bucky Harris
19. Dean Lyle
20. Kevin Yeaman
21. David Letsch
22. Polly Letsch
 
Question/Topic Request for you guys and gals taking the class to ask the instructor.

While browsing the classifieds on Enos, I came across a Glock 34 marketed as a great production gun. Among the upgrades listed was a line that said speed chute with a picture of the factory magwell. (Link to post on Enos)

Here is the accompanying picture...
JrDrrlF.jpg


Someone replied to his post stating that it was not production legal due to this modification, to which the OP attached a letter from the NROI (listed below) as 'proof' that it was legal.

Would someone mind inquiring about this?

Thanks,
Shane

Letter from NROI to OP regarding the mod in question, note that it's dated 2007, which is why I'm wondering if this 'ruling' is still valid.

[SIZE=9pt]This is what I asked and got back from DNROI.

From: Mitch Mora
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:52 AM
Subject: Production Magwell?

Hello, will this be legal in Production under the new 2008 rules. It seems like it is only an internal modification, an enhancement to the grip internal beveling.

Grips â€" Internal beveling. Checkering, stippling, and
addition of grip tape or grip sleeves.

No magwell attachments or external flaring of the
magwell. The lateral width of the well may not be
more than 1/4" wider than the lateral width of the
magazine.


http://southpawcustom.com/speedway.htm

Thanks,
Mitch



Hi Mitch,

Assuming it does not change the external dimensions, it appears this would comply with the new rule.

John Amidon
VP USPSA
Director NROI
[/SIZE]
 
Shane P said:
Question/Topic Request for you guys and gals taking the class to ask the instructor.

While browsing the classifieds on Enos, I came across a Glock 34 marketed as a great production gun. Among the upgrades listed was a line that said speed chute with a picture of the factory magwell. (Link to post on Enos)

Here is the accompanying picture...
JrDrrlF.jpg


Someone replied to his post stating that it was not production legal due to this modification, to which the OP attached a letter from the NROI (listed below) as 'proof' that it was legal.

Would someone mind inquiring about this?

Thanks,
Shane

Letter from NROI to OP regarding the mod in question, note that it's dated 2007, which is why I'm wondering if this 'ruling' is still valid.

This is what I asked and got back from DNROI.

From: Mitch Mora
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:52 AM
Subject: Production Magwell?

Hello, will this be legal in Production under the new 2008 rules. It seems like it is only an internal modification, an enhancement to the grip internal beveling.

Grips â€" Internal beveling. Checkering, stippling, and
addition of grip tape or grip sleeves.

No magwell attachments or external flaring of the
magwell. The lateral width of the well may not be
more than 1/4" wider than the lateral width of the
magazine.


http://southpawcustom.com/speedway.htm

Thanks,
Mitch



Hi Mitch,

Assuming it does not change the external dimensions, it appears this would comply with the new rule.

John Amidon
VP USPSA
Director NROI
My accurate iron Glock had a similar mod. I never shot it at nationals so nobody ever looked close enough to care if it was or wasn't legal. If Accurate Rom said it was Ok who was I to argue?
 
My accurate iron Glock had a similar mod. I never shot it at nationals so nobody ever looked close enough to care if it was or wasn't legal. If Accurate Rom said it was Ok who was I to argue?
I currently shoot said glock and have never been questioned on the internal mag well but again at club matches
 
Back
Top