jeffhughes
Well-Known Fanatic
Why be logical?Wall said:wouldn't one quick pass with a file remove any stamp on the firing pin anyway?
Why be logical?Wall said:wouldn't one quick pass with a file remove any stamp on the firing pin anyway?
That's the evil simplicity of it. A Glock is a Glock? No.Scott Hearn said:And Glock joins the party! <----Click it!So I guess I don't understand their dumbass law. Why do existing models get a pass? I'm assuming they do, but too lazy don't care enough to go look it up.
Then you become a felon under Ca. law for possession of an altered weapon.Wall said:wouldn't one quick pass with a file remove any stamp on the firing pin anyway?
You don't think "they" know that?brandt9913 said:I haven't read the law and don't care to, but firing pins wear out and break under normal range use by people that actually shoot their guns. Do these ****tards, sorry Libtards, not realize firing pins on most firearms get replaced periodically?
I've seen guys in several states pick up brass just for that reason.Scott Hearn said:Yep. Maybe two passes to be "safe".
What I want to know is what happens when brass picked up off of a range gets dropped at a crime scene? Probably 100 other reasons why this won't work.
Crime prevention is not what this is about.Jeff said:I've seen guys in several states pick up brass just for that reason.
A firing pin leaves a signature already... and most forensic people will tell you that the extractor claw is a very positive indication of a match. That fired case is shipped with many new pistols... in Mass you have to send it to the state for there files.
Sorry... do police work the old fashioned way. Tie the shooter to the crime... tie the shooter to the gun... tie the evidence to the gun- in that order. Micro stamps will not replace good old shoe leather police work.
exactly, good sir. to trot out the cliche... it's "people control"WillR said:Crime prevention is not what this is about.