Make your own rules BS!

[TheSwampFox]

John, we don't have to wait for someone to get arrested. The permit argument is likely headed to the Supreme Court already.

http://blogs.lawyers.com/2013/02/no-rig ... ed-weapon/

Here is the courts decision:

http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1149.pdf

What happens when SCOTUS says the CWP's are invalid?

 

[John Canuck]

I don't know. I was just offering a couple bucks if he gets that far, and taking to opportunity to remind about constitutional carry sub-committee meetings.

What do you think happens?

 

[Cohiba]

Sorry, I am just not of the mindset that we rationalize breaking the laws we can afford to pay the fines for.
Right is right.
Everyone here has broken "the law".
Is what we need, MORE laws?

From the link abouve let me post this snippet...
But the final ruling held, ?In light of our nation?s extensive practice of restricting citizens? freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendment?s protections.?

In light of our nation?s extensive practice of restricting citizens? freedom...

READ...WE HAVE BEEN GETTING AWAY WITH IT FOR SO LONG ALREADY...

we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendment?s protections.

GFY!

That about suns up the position right?

What has become normal (ie. restricting citizens freedoms) is the norm...and the norm is now the law, regardless of the constitutional validity.