Magpul Industries relocating?

Shane Armstrong said:
I guess we'll see how serious MAGPUL is then.
You know I would think that if they were so inclined that they could challenge it in court pretty quickly. I guess we shall see.

Chris_Andersen said:
I tuned in to your link just in time to see that Scott. Kind of ruined my day.
Yea me too. I guess the dims just sat there and were quiet until the vote, because from my impression of what I heard, about 75% of those that spoke were against it.
 
Chris_Andersen said:
I tuned in to your link just in time to see that Scott. Kind of ruined my day.
I must have tuned in at about the exact same time.
hate to se it :(
 
National shooting sports matches should avoid scheduling matches in states that pull this. Probably wouldn't make a big dent, but it would cause an outcry from smaller communities that benefit from the tourism dollars. Lawmakers need to see their actions have consequences they have not really thought through. Local matches can only adjust and comply to their new rules.
 
</body>
Here is a Washington State ban bill. Responding to the Newtown school massacre, the bill would ban the sale of semi-automatic weapons that use detachable ammunition magazines. Clips that contain more than 10 rounds would be illegal. “In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall ... safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”
Some of the signers when questioned said they didn't really read the bill that closley or didn't know the inspection part was in there.
The article went on to say there was probably no chance of it passing.
 
Correct me if I am wrong but did three Columbine shooters have 10 round mags? This country is being over run politically-correct, liberal, Constitution hating pansies.
 
Someone pointed out that this is just the house voting. Still needs to go through the state senate. Correct me if I'm wrong please.
 
Jesse Tischauser said:
Someone pointed out that this is just the house voting. Still needs to go through the state senate. Correct me if I'm wrong please.
You are correct. But what I heard is that the best chance for killing this was in the House today, they were saying it will get through the senate easily. I checked and in the state senate the dims have a 3 vote majority there too. I doubt that they can turn 2 of those.

Edit: The gov said he would sign the mag ban as long as it's between 15 and 20 rounds. That's why they changed it from 10 to 15. Just another dim wanting to say that they "did something". This way they get to "take credit" with their libtard base without having to take quite so much heat from the other side by banning most currently bought handguns. Blocking a 17 round mag down to 15 just isn't going to be that big a deal to those.
 
Jesse Tischauser said:
Here is a link to message the governor to let him know you won't be making your 5-6 trips annually to Colorado to hunt and shoot 3 gun. Heck I'm gonna quit going there to ski or see my sister.

http://www.colorado.gov/govhdir/requests/opinion-leg.html
Done. Here is what I sent. I have no doubt that it will never see the light of day.

Congratulations on your State House for passing this bill today. As a reward I will never spend another dime on tourism there. I will now go to New Mexico to Elk hunt and Wyoming to Antelope hunt. Should you make good on your promise to sign this into law, enjoy your little communist utopia.
 
scubor2 said:
A MO. legislator introduced legislation that would make it a felony for lawmakers to introduce a bill restricting 2nd ammendment rights.
That's how you do it right there
 
Back
Top