Which PCC to buy you ask?

Register to hide this ad
I've been thinking about the beretta. I wish it took glock mags.

What PCC options are there that take Glock mags?
There's just about an endless amount of AR platform lowers that accept Glock Mags now.
I use a JP but QC10 is also top notch
 
The match uppers with block we sell are 100% reliable and we have the tuned mags with them 20, 25, 32 &40 rd.Use your ar lower you use in 3-gun and keep the same fell for both. 16", brake & key mod handguard . It will not break the bank.
 
Matt Rigsby said:
I got to searching and found out that Taylor Freelance makes a +10 extension for the Colt pattern mags.
Yes, also Taccom makes a coupler to stick a 32 & 20 end to end for a 52rnd mag.
 
Jesse Tischauser said:
I knew about those but didn't want to say anything until after the high cap hosefest.
Ass
Wall said:
Yes, also Taccom makes a coupler to stick a 32 & 20 end to end for a 52rnd mag.
I don't know if I'd trust the spring to push the last few rounds out.
 
mike_pinto said:
Shut up Tony. Matt, they suck, you should for sure not waste your money on anything that takes you past 30 rounds.. :)
I'm not going to get one of the couplers. It just doesn't tickle my pickle.
I will buy 1 of the +10 extensions to try out though. If it doesn't work then I'll stick stick with my standard 32 round Brownell's mags.
 
Reloads are easier (faster) with the Colt pattern mags. If you use them get an Maglula to load them. They are a evil cat lady to load when you get past 15 rounds.

Edit to add: FYI Wilson Combat makes 9mm lowers for Glock, Beretta and M&P mags but you have to pick your poison and have a checkbook like Trumps.
 
Question on uppers.

Do standard AR 15 uppers work well for PCC guns? If so, then what does a "made for 9mm" upper (such as the QC-10) get you? Cosmetic? Reliability? Accuracy? All three?
 
Travis Lowry said:
Question on uppers.

Do standard AR 15 uppers work well for PCC guns? If so, then what does a "made for 9mm" upper (such as the QC-10) get you? Cosmetic? Reliability? Accuracy? All three?
There are subtle advantages such as a smaller ejection port & lack of gas tube hole. These are places that won't be open to let trash come into the receivers, but it's not a must. Most 9mm receivers will be billet & styled better than a regular forged milspec receiver. In the case of the QC10 you mentioned, it is built (styled) to match the lower better than a 223 upper receiver.
 
I wish I would have kept my QC10 receivers and built the gun out with JP parts rather then ordering a complete JP rifle. I didn't know what was required of the 9mm build at the time. So a Complete JP was a sure thing. Now that Ive completely removed all the parts that came on my JP with stuff i like all I have left is the trigger, receivers, barrel, bolt and scs buffer. It would have been cheaper to start with QC10 receivers and I like them better then the JP for the reasons Wall mentioned.
 
Also, a blowback system is a bit harder on the components. "The 9mm" specific recievers are billet and a little thicker than the forged 223 receivers.
In a regular AR the bolt locks into the barrel lugs during firing. In a blowback system there is no lockup whatsoever. It is all dependent on mass & spring energy. So the components tend to take a little bit more of a beating.
 
Back
Top