shootingbuff
Well-Known Fanatic
That would be a good thing to know.
First cops are supposed to look for the bad - geez
You catch more flies with sugar than with out. If one only wants to protect their rights it isn't going to happen getting mouthy on the street. Get to the point where you are getting mouthy, not being cooperative and acting like a jerk and I would have to ascertain what was right, what was wrong, etc and well let's say I would be very polite but very slow as well.
This guy may be a nut in the video and I know NM is sane about OC, but if this is how folks are suggesting to act then I will pass this stupidity on to the governor and to the sheriffs that the citizens are not mature enough to OC and in some cases maybe not own firearms.
Open disobedience or out right trying to instigate a confrontation should be dealt with like an out of control three yr old and if you want to know how I really feel about I'll tell you. I support no gun control except that which is applied while firing, but I do not like anything causing a blemish on those willing to be responsible and mature gun owners. Why do responsible gun owners have to suffer because of an immature attitude? They shouldn't. I think most think of OC as cool. I look at it as someone is going to get beat down because they are running off at the mouth. Really cool setting back gun rights. toot toot blow the horn for the antis. Crap like this is exactly what is going to hurt gun ownership. Yep really brave making sure everything is on camera. Guess we know who is afraid of a beat down. I would suggest the camera person and any others with the so-called citizen get a liberal dose of night stick. This is freaking insane. If thier daddy didn't teach them manners then I hope someone does. Sooner the better
When it comes to open carry issues, I spend a lot more time at opencarry.org than I do here. It is the premier site for OC anywhere in the nation. The recommendations from there is to carry a recorder of some type whenever carrying, video or just voice, but carry a recorder. They also recommend that you be well versed in the specifics of your rights, as not all LE are in favor of OC or know the specific laws that cover it. A recorder works both ways, if you don't know the law and get into a confrontation, you have just "sunk your own ship" but if LE tries to make up laws as they go, like the officer in the video, then you have what you need if the situation escalates to the point of an illegal arrest or seizure. The LAC in this video was very well versed in the law and its application, he did everything he was required to do by the laws of the land. It appeared to me that after the initial encounter, the LE was on a "fishing expedition"
"Cops "looking for the bad - geez"
While that is part of their job, how many start a shift thinking they want to get in an altercation with a BG? They train for it and are supposed to be ready for it, but how many do you really think walk to their car thinking of how many fights they can get into today?
I can't speak for Maine, but if this had happened in VA, or some other states that have gold star open carry status, it would have gone a lot differently.
Police receive MWAG call - dispatcher asks if the MWAG is doing anything else, (such as brandishing, threatening others). If the answer is no, the dispatcher informs the caller that MWAG is legal and they don't send an officer. The officer is free to pursue other duties.
My take on the video is this - MWAG call, police respond. The MWAG is legally carrying and obeying the law. Officer confirmed this. Situation should have stopped there. Man was courteous, but insistent, that the officer did not have the right to secure his weapon or detain him. Facts later shown to be true. The officer asked for ID which the man was not required, by law, to produce. Officer says "you might be a felon" but does not have any cause for suspicion to support that. The man knew the law and his rights and stood up for them. He never presented himself as a physical threat in any manner, but verbally challenged the officer and his lack of knowledge of the law. He never called the officer names or treated him with disrespect.
"Open disobedience or out right trying to instigate a confrontation should be dealt with like an out of control three yr old"
Where would civil rights be if it had not been for open disobedience? Would we even have a country if it had not been for open disobedience? You appear to be ready to label anyone with a gun as a "suspect" before there is any evidence they have done anything wrong. Our constitution guarantees that we are "innocent until proven guilty" and in this situation there was no evidence that there was any guilt for anything.
With the coming change to the carry laws in Oklahoma, Law enforcement and the carrying public need to be versed in the laws and requirements. We don' t need anyone trying to make things up as they go. Courtesy and respect is a 2 way street.
Hey I hear birdshot is the best thing for HD.
You may try and blur the lines of fighting for this country and it's independence as well as civil liberties. The fact is having a confrontation for the sake of having a confrontation isn't anywhere near the same and you do everyone who stepped up for those legitimate causes disrespect.
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
I truly don't care what one thinks about a state with a gold star OC rating. If a LEO doesn't get facts they are wrong and I doubt it would had been different because the gun guy was looking for 5 min of fame. The difference could very well had been a cop not having as much patience. Like I stated if anyone is concerned about gun rights they would stay low profile and demonstrate they are mature enough to carry without getting into trouble or starting it.
The LEO did have his facts wrong and the citizen tried to help educate him. And the citizen didn't start anything, he was minding his own business when stopped.
It is obvious the only agenda some have is to be the opposite of a good gun owner. As stated anything to cause a blemish I don't like. I also don't like mouthy individuals looking for 5 min of fame or anyone being disrespectful.
If one took the reasonable person standard and applied it to the gun guy he would be a a very big fail. He wasn’t reasonable he was not assisting in the officer getting the information and in doing so was acting an arse. Very good demonstration of a mature person.
The LEO would be a big fail as well. The citizen was giving the LEO all the info needed and required by law, but the LEO continued to push and want more than he was legally entitled to.
Again, we will have to agree to disagree on this issue. You may have the last word, I am moving on.
Also, wear a goddamn seatbelt what is wrong with you.
Because it is not the "Gubbermits" business whether or not ANYONE wears a seatbelt, or a helmet or eats their wheaties, etc.
can I make dirty phone calls to your ex-girlfriends?It's none of the government's business whether or not I make dirty phone calls to my ex-girlfriends but I don't because it would be a bad idea.
can I make dirty phone calls to your ex-girlfriends?
Or current, It really doesn't matter to me.