dennishoddy
Moderator
Guilty of murder in the first degree. I kind of figured it would go that way.
Give him a ****ing award and those other two pieces of **** the chair. He didn't do the right thing but he didn't put himself in that situation. But that is just my opinion.
i dont think any of us know all the details of the case. all we hear is that these punks came in to rob him, he defended himself very well, and now he gets the shaft.
im sure if we were at the trial and heard the evidence and were on the jury, it could be a whole different situation and outlook on the case.
my opinion: this case stinks to high heaven. i think that dead is dead. just because he went and put more rounds in the punk, he aint gonna get no deader. well hell, maybe he was twitching or something.
i dont think any of us know all the details of the case. all we hear is that these punks came in to rob him, he defended himself very well, and now he gets the shaft.
im sure if we were at the trial and heard the evidence and were on the jury, it could be a whole different situation and outlook on the case.
my opinion: this case stinks to high heaven. i think that dead is dead. just because he went and put more rounds in the punk, he aint gonna get no deader. well hell, maybe he was twitching or something.
doesn't a FIRST DEGREE MURDER conviction require PREMEDITATION?The thing I have the biggest problem with is FIRST DEGREE MURDER!
He might have done some things wrong but FIRST DEGREE MURDER? NO.
doesn't a FIRST DEGREE MURDER conviction require PREMEDITATION?