Torontogosh said:
I
There really seems to be to be a school of thought that reports that the 410 is way too weak for self defense, even at close range. Considering that the judge is really sold as a combat/defensive weapon, is Taurus possibly misleading buyers? Conversely, people have been carrying .22's and .25's for decades, so whose to say what "adequate" power is?
Stopping power is not the same as lethality. A .22 LR will kill but probably won't stop.
The FBI standard is 12-18" of penetration, which ensures penetrating clothing and being able to reach vitals from even less than ideal angles. Some premium defense ammo for the judge like the PDX-1 does manage to meet that criteria, if used at 5 FEET (not 5 yards), with 3" shells (most folks load up 2.5") (
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2011 ... -gel-test/).
You could also compare with the known performance of other rounds. Out of a Judge, the PDX-1 premium ammo clocks in at around 625 FPS (
http://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/taurus- ... allistics/). Each of the disks weighs 68 grains. That's almost as good as the .32 ACP, which pushes a mid-60s bullet at nearly 1000 FPS for around 125 ft-lbs of energy. So I guess you could say that getting a hit with all three of the disks in the PDX-1 ammunition is like three .32 ACP hits. While I personally consider a 380 or 38 special to be the minimum for defensive cartridges, the .32 was used for a long time in Europe.
You can also look at world-wide calibers selected for personal weapons by professionals, i.e., military and police. The Eastern Bloc settled on the 9x18mm. The Europeans generally use the .380 ACP these days, except for NATO forces which use 9mm. In the US, the 9mm and 40 SW are popular with LEOs these days.
So... Inside of five yards (where the spread issues are bad but manageable and the ballistics are marginal or acceptable) the Judge
probably delivers acceptable terminal performance with premium self defense .410 ammo designed for use in a short barrel, especially if you have a 100% safe backstop (maybe a controlled environment inside your house) because some of that shot WILL miss your target, even at 5 yards. I'm certainly not going to volunteer to be shot by one. It isn't, however, going to deliver the performance you'd see out of a Glock in 9/40/.45
or a 20 or 12 gauge Mossberg 500 (heck, even a .410 with a long barrel that allows complete combustion).
So, I wouldn't say that Taurus is misleading consumers. I would just say that consumers want to believe certain things, like "I can get shotgun level performance out of this nifty versatile little handgun! And I won't have to aim! And its cheap! And it isn't a boring black glock like everyone else has!" When defensive firearms are concerned, TANSTAAFL... In the end you pays your money and takes your chances. At that price point, I'd personally take a used trade-in glock over a judge, myself, for defensive use.