LuckyDucky
Well-Known Fanatic
It's been awhile since I've posted!
The reciprocity statute, 21 O.S. § 1290.26 has recently been amended by S.B. 1785 and S.B. 1733.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/Deliverdocument.asp?CiteID=69809
Both of the amendments amend the statute in different ways, without reference to each other.
How do we interpret the two amendments together?
There is an Attorney General Opinion from 2006 on interpreting amendments.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/Deliverdocument.asp?CiteID=445716
Also, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (where you'd end up if you were convicted of a violation of § 1290.26 and appealed) has followed the same interpretation procedure as in the AG Opinion.
Here is the problem:
Ultimately, it is up to a court to interpret the statute. The statute itself is unclear enough that it gives the courts leeway to screw you. Do you want to be a test case?
According to the AG Opinion, I would say we interpret the amendments together and read it as if you have a permit from another state, you can carry concealed or unconcealed here, and if you are from a constitutional carry state, you can only carry concealed.
I may be a bit cynical but I could see a cop investigate an open carrier, arrest the person for being from out of state, and then a court could interpret the law in a restrictive manner so the person gets convicted.
The reciprocity statute, 21 O.S. § 1290.26 has recently been amended by S.B. 1785 and S.B. 1733.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/Deliverdocument.asp?CiteID=69809
Both of the amendments amend the statute in different ways, without reference to each other.
How do we interpret the two amendments together?
There is an Attorney General Opinion from 2006 on interpreting amendments.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/Deliverdocument.asp?CiteID=445716
Also, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (where you'd end up if you were convicted of a violation of § 1290.26 and appealed) has followed the same interpretation procedure as in the AG Opinion.
Here is the problem:
Ultimately, it is up to a court to interpret the statute. The statute itself is unclear enough that it gives the courts leeway to screw you. Do you want to be a test case?
According to the AG Opinion, I would say we interpret the amendments together and read it as if you have a permit from another state, you can carry concealed or unconcealed here, and if you are from a constitutional carry state, you can only carry concealed.
I may be a bit cynical but I could see a cop investigate an open carrier, arrest the person for being from out of state, and then a court could interpret the law in a restrictive manner so the person gets convicted.