No Assault Weapon Used In School Shooting

Register to hide this ad
There's just too many things coming to surface that don't add up with rhe official claims...
 
old report....listen to the clip...dec 11th this week.....old report

not new report....

but nothing has been released official since ........waiting with baited breath for the real info...if we ever get to hear it
 
Not to. Speak for him but I think the intent of the op was to show that in the beginning they said the ar was in the trunk then they chainged to all he used was the ar.
 
Makes you wonder why they will not release the surveillance footage from the school. Maybe because the AR want really there......just saying.

They released the video from Columbine and other mass shootings, but not Sandyhook.
 
Really? :roll:

The Connecticut State Police released a statement on January 18th attempting to clarify the confusion generated by the inconsistent and irresponsible media reporting following the Sandy Hook elementary shooting in Newtown on December 14th.

The weapons seized from the attacker Adam Lanza are as follows, according to the State Police:
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber? model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round clips
#2. Glock 10 mm handgun
#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun
Seized from suspect?s car in parking lot:
#4. Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun (seized from car in parking lot)

Remember the source of the original video linked: initial reporting (often inaccurate) from a mainstream media source that wouldn't know the difference between a Sig Schnauzer, a Bushwhacker, and an AK-47. Yes, another MSM source reported a Bushwhacker and Sig Schnauzer used -- should this make us that that the perp was clearly armed with a medium-sized dog and a piece of gardening equipment?

Accept the four pistols report for what it is: initial reporting from an ignorant source. The Sandy Hook "truther" stuff does not really help the cause much.

We should know much more at D+90. A judge sealed all the records of the investigation for 90 days, so if we make it to March or so without draconian bills passing many more facts will be available. I'm personally curious to know what the police response time was. CNN reported 20 minutes for police to arrive on scene, and if that is true, then that is excellent ammunition for pushing for alternative solutions other than gun control. After all... how many defenseless people could you shoot with a muzzleloader in 20 minutes?
 
The truth might be interesting for the sake of bickering on the Internet but will have zero impact on policy or lawmaking.

It's kind of like Bible Science/Creationism/Intelligent Design. If you have a pre-determined agenda and end-game then no information acquired along the route of travel will change that. If you find supporting evidence then you scream it from the top of your lungs. If you find contradictory evidence then you either ignore it or personally attack and discredit anyone that notices it.

The anti-gun news agencies and politicians have already decided that only police, military, Hollywood production studios and their own private security details should have any gun. Everything we see is merely them trying to build a bridge to close the gap between where we are today and where they want us tomorrow.
 
Back
Top