LEOs are going fishing...

rotarymike

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
1,036
Location
North Charleston
Be extra sure that if you have a gun on Armslist or Gunbroker that you know the rules on selling intrastate (ie, generally, that it has to go through an FFL on their end).

What constitutes intrastate? Selling to a resident of another state. Citizenship and residency of a state is a term of art for lawyers; it is one part of what is called being 'domiciled' in a particular state. Here, the specific use of the term is to imply that a person is either a citizen of your state, or not. If they are not, then selling a gun to them is 'intrastate' and not allowed for a non-licensee (ie, non-FFL). Be very sure of your buyer's state of residence. Seeing a driver's license wouldn't hurt. Voter registration card as well would be good. Neither is conclusive as to residency, but both support a reasonable inference of residency.

Reason I post this:
I've got a few things on Gunbroker. For the most part, stuff I've had on gunbroker that needed to go through an FFL was not an issue.
This time, I got a request from someone, generic ISP email address, saying "he'd be down in Pawley's Island and would like to pick up the item in person." Something sounded off, so I told him sure, if he's a SC resident with ID.

Then he responds that he has a SC out-of-state carry permit (wtf is that anyway?) or would I prefer proof he owns property here in SC. This time, I directly ask if he's a resident of SC. Tell him if not, then we need to go through an FFL.

Next response is trying to pressure me to sell because the gun ban being abandoned will mean prices will go down, etc. and some BS about tax assessors and out-of-state citizens getting SC permits because they own property here (which may be true, as far as it goes). NOTE: 18 U.S.C. 922 DOES NOT HAVE EXCEPTIONS for CWP holders or the like. FFL or no FFL is the only distinction made.

My last response was that I'd pass on the sale, that I wasn't interested in committing a felony.

His response: Don't blame you.

He never admitted to being from another state. He never said he was a SC resident. He DID strongly imply that he was NOT a resident. After three rounds of email with me telling him what the law was, offering to send it to an FFL in his state, etc. and he pushing for a f-t-f transfer I just didn't want to deal with the potential for bad, and told him no.

Did some checking on the email address. It's a spoofed email so it looks like it's coming from an individual on Verizon, but being relayed by Yahoo Mail servers, and encoded with MS Exchange Server MIME. Hardly anyone uses MS Exchange Server at home. Companies do. Government offices do.

So do I know for sure it was a LEO, fishing for an illegal gun sale? No. But if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc...
 
Register to hide this ad
Wanted to add:

This is not a thread that was intended discussing merits of free and open transfer, 2A rights, necessity or not for ID or bills of sale. Those issues are being addressed elsewhere on this forum (and if not, please start a new thread on it).

Last, always go with your gut. If it doesn't feel right, it probably isn't.
 
I had something like that happen about 3 weeks ago...Someone responded to an old Armslist ad that I had forgot to cancel...Wanted to buy the gun I had advertised.
He ask me to meet him in Columbia...Half way to drive for both of us...Sounded reasonable to me...I have done it more that once...

We kept talking and then the conversation got kind of strange. Ask me how long I had the gun, how many times had I fired it...and...what was I shooting at...???? WHoe...where did that come from????

I ask him "Where do you live?" he said he lived in N. Carolina but his brother lived in Columbia and he went there all the time...
I told him I could not legally sell him the gun because he was not a resident of SC...He said it would be OK...he would hand the money to his brother and he could hand it to me...That way I was selling to a SC resident....Then, I ask him "Sir..have you ever heard of "Straw Purchases' "
He kind of double talked for a couple of minutes....then....He thanked me for being an honest person and doing the right thing and then hung up.....

Lets Just Be Careful Out There...

Steve
 
I think Carsontech had a similar experience a few weeks ago.

Watch your six, everyone.
 
And it couldnt just be people trying to get weapons that they want without doing the paperwork?
Why is the assumption that its LE attempting to entrap someone?
After having worked in LE for a good portion of my youth i feel secure in saying, they are plenty busy to be attempting such a plan that has such a low percentage of actual success.
Honestly. Its a lot of effort and work to go into plan an in the end to have arrested someone for such a vauge reason, under circumstances that the most junior defense lawyer would be able to beat.

THINK PEOPLE

Law enforcment is a buisness. They are looking to do 2 things. A-increase thier budget by inflating the perception that theres more crime than they can handle, and B- make easy arrests on people who cant afford to fight the charges =easy convictions.

Your proposed cheme of attempting to entrap people into sellling a gun accross state lines does neither and works against both.
#1 which LE aganecy do you suppose would be making the case? Pawleys Island local? SLED? The laws against selling firearms out of state are federal interstae commerce laws and would be handled by the feds, in particular the ATF. an agency of about 5000 folks including all clerical and training personell, who are in charge of policing ALL FLL's in the nation. Trust me...they couldnt afford to put the time into a plan like that. Theres not enough reward.
The idea is assumptive and paranoia laden.
 
So cops don't use bait cars and the FBI doesn't set up terrorist stings, and the ATF is just misunderstood?
 
It is a documented fact that the NYPD has gone to Southern states and illegally purchased guns and smuggled them back to NY in order to put them on display for news agencies so the mayor can whine on CNN about gunshow loopholes and internet sales. Simply because an operation as alluded to by the original poster doesn't have the highest probable rate of return from a business-oriented analysis doesn't mean that an operation with low chance of success will not be undertaken due to the enormous political and news benefit of that one-in-a-million illegal sale.


But Occam's Razor says that it is likely just guys that either 1) don't want to conform to the law so their gun is "off the books" or 2) actually are prohibited persons for whatever reason.

I'm "The Gun Guy" at work. Nurses and even other officers have been badgering me since Sandy Hook to find them Face to Face sales of AR-15s, AKs, et al so that they can have an "assault rifle" that is "off the books" and safe from confiscation. None of these guys are prohibited persons but every single one of them is extremely reluctant to buy from an FFL or conduct a face to face with someone that wants to see their ID (even police ID!) because they fear an eventual confiscation years down the line.

Never underestimate pessimism, paranoia and plain 'ole FEAR .
 
Bloomberg's paid thugs have been at this for years. They were doing it three or four years ago at gun shows, and then started with the online community of making contact, suggesting they were shady in some way, then badgering you to become a felon. Virginia passed a law to make it illegal so they moved elsewhere.

It would not surprise me in the least to find out the JBT's at the ATF are running around trying to get people to break laws that shouldn't even be laws. They must be bored with no gun trafficking to do on the southern border.
 
seeing as how SC has no law requiring paperwork or background checks regarding private transfers, I'd say its going to be pretty useless to try and charge someone with a crime.

but if someone would please direct me to the portion of the law that says I am required to perform an ID check or background investigation on a private firearms transfer I'd love to read it.

But, I can find no State or Federal requirment for the inspection of a state issued ID for the transfer of a firearm between unlicensed persons.
The GCA reads "knowingly"... So what exactly is a private seller required to ensure?

felons have DL's.
People have CWP who have been been charge with domestic violence.
What does a SCDL prove other than the person , at the time the ID was issued, was a resident of SC. Period.

Now if you want to go on about it...making up requirments as you go, the govenrment will surely be happy to make those changes to the law and begin to require transfers to be conducted by dealers. In essense killing the private transfer benefit that we have as a free people. To dispose of OUR PROPERTY as we se fit.
Am I saying sell guns illegally? sell to convicts and minors and people deemed unfit for mental reasons?
NO.
I am saying that soon as you show a willingness to follow a suggestion, it will become a requirment.
 
is this thread locked or something? test test...

/edited: Well, I can post short stuff but not my actual reply. Any list of keywords etc that I've missed, that prevent a post from going through?

I get a 'permission denied to access posting.php on this site' or some similar thing.
 
It is not locked. Recommend if you have any user issues, pm Pops, as he handles the technical wizarding.
 
Well, lets see if this post goes through.
You mentioned your actual post, did you have a long page of copy?
I'm not aware of any limits on the size of a single post, but I'll see if I can turn something up.

Nope, it looks like you can type up to 60,000 characters in a single post.
Although I could see myself getting pretty upset if I typed more than 60,000 characters and the submit choked. :shock:

You may also try to log out, clear the cookies on your browser and log back in to reset your token.

pops ;)
 
Pay careful attention to the last section of this post regarding SECTION 23-31-20.

SECTION 16-23-30. Sale or delivery of handgun to and possession by certain persons unlawful; stolen handguns.

(A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly sell, offer to sell, deliver, lease, rent, barter, exchange, or transport for sale into this State any handgun to:

(1) a person who has been convicted of a crime of violence in any court of the United States, the several states, commonwealths, territories, possessions, or the District of Columbia or who is a fugitive from justice or a habitual drunkard or a drug addict or who has been adjudicated mentally incompetent;

(2) a person who is a member of a subversive organization;

(3) a person under the age of eighteen, but this shall not apply to the issue of handguns to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, active or reserve, National Guard, State Militia, or R. O. T. C., when on duty or training or the temporary loan of handguns for instructions under the immediate supervision of a parent or adult instructor; or

(4) a person who by order of a circuit judge or county court judge of this State has been adjudged unfit to carry or possess a firearm, such adjudication to be made upon application by any police officer, or by any prosecuting officer of this State, or sua sponte, by the court, but a person who is the subject of such an application is entitled to reasonable notice and a proper hearing prior to any such adjudication.

(B) It is unlawful for a person enumerated in subsection (A) to possess or acquire handguns within this State.

(C) A person shall not knowingly buy, sell, transport, pawn, receive, or possess any stolen handgun or one from which the original serial number has been removed or obliterated

SECTION 23-31-10. Purchase of rifle or shotgun in another state.

A resident of this State including a corporation or other business entity maintaining a place of business in this State, who may lawfully purchase and receive delivery of a rifle or shotgun in this State, may purchase a rifle or shotgun in another state and transport or receive it in this State; provided, that the sale meets the lawful requirements of each state, meets all lawful requirements of any federal statute, and is made by a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector.

HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 66-581; 1971 (57) 799; 2012 Act No. 285, Section 1, eff June 29, 2012.

SECTION 23-31-20. Purchase of rifle or shotgun in this State by resident of any state.

A resident of any state may purchase rifles and shotguns in this State if the resident conforms to applicable provisions of statutes and regulations of this State, the United States, and of the state in which the person resides.
I take this to mean that if its legal in his state to purchase out of state, then it is legal for you to sell to him despite not being a resident of this state. Lawyers, please respond on the legalize of this section
 
PCSShogun-

The problem is federal law. The Gun Control Act of 1968 suppressed interstate commerce in firearms by making it unlawful to acquire a firearm across state lines with certain exceptions. One exception is acquiring a long gun from an FFL. Another, for example, is inheritance.

Acquiring a firearm in a face-to-face private sale with a resident of another state violates federal law, and thus would also not be in compliance with 23-31-20.
 
armaborealis said:
PCSShogun-

The problem is federal law. The Gun Control Act of 1968 suppressed interstate commerce in firearms by making it unlawful to acquire a firearm across state lines with certain exceptions. One exception is acquiring a long gun from an FFL. Another, for example, is inheritance.

Acquiring a firearm in a face-to-face private sale with a resident of another state violates federal law, and thus would also not be in compliance with 23-31-20.

THIS.
I am not exactly sure if the seller is the one who is considered "AT FAULT" seeing as the seller has no responsibility to check ID and therefore can only be in violation if he knowingly sells to an out of state resident.
Funny thing...words and thier meanings and all that junk.
 
Back
Top