Guns you DON'T like

J.P. Morgan said:
Ha Ha! Well, you kind of exposed the greatest flaw of the gun.... The operator :) Dude, that M&P is perfect! I was just being facetious
By facetious, you mean joking about the work whose quality and efficacy I base the very value of my existence on?




Ha I was too
 
Sig P250. Worlds longest trigger pull. Every one I sold the customer wanted to know if he could trade it for a different gun after a few months. When I talked to Sig at the Shot show when they brought out the P320, I mentioned they had tried the caliber/frame flexibility thing on the 250 and it was a piece of doodoo. The guy smiled and nodded his head in agreement. Luckily the P320 aint the P250.
 
Can't argue with Matt if the 870 was built in the last 10 years or so, but prior to that the 870 was as good as it gets.
Honestly, the gun I hate to shoot is any of the light, plastic frame .380 autos with factory ammo....i.e. Kel-Tec, Ruger (Kel-Tec copy) etc
Or a .38 derringer ( Davis Ind )
I'd rather shoot a Lorcin
 
mike cyrwus said:
He did that because he stuck with one handgun and learned how to shoot, and didnt jump around to the next newest thing
The only reason the guy didn't keep shooting the Beretta was because, at the time, they stopped making the 92G. The only reason.
 
I'll say it: I don't like the S&W M&P.

Nothing says "I want a Glock, but I don't want a Glock" quite like the M&P.

Shoot what you want, but the topic is elephant dung we don't like.
 
Micah_Rowe said:
I'll say it: I don't like the S&W M&P.

Nothing says "I want a Glock, but I don't want a Glock" quite like the M&P.

Shoot what you want, but the topic is elephant dung we don't like.
Haters gonna hate. :sarcastichand:
 
mcintireb said:
Can't argue with Matt if the 870 was built in the last 10 years or so, but prior to that the 870 was as good as it gets.
Honestly, the gun I hate to shoot is any of the light, plastic frame .380 autos with factory ammo....i.e. Kel-Tec, Ruger (Kel-Tec copy) etc
Or a .38 derringer ( Davis Ind )
I'd rather shoot a Lorcin
Good point. The Wing Master was/is the pinnacle of pump guns. Sadly Cerabus has stopped that.

Looking for the reason a Lorcin is better than a P3AT or Ruger?
 
dennishoddy said:
Looking for the reason a Lorcin is better than a P3AT or Ruger?
Not saying that Lorcins are better by any stretch. Lorcin is exactly what people say it is....crap.
The backstrap is twice as wide and it weighs 3 times as much as the pocket .380s....less felt recoil in the web of your hand.

That flat, little backstrap on the plastic guns hurts as much as a Nun smacking your open palm with a ruler.
Opinions vary though
 
pdh said:
Less a gun and more a gun part

I cant stand the standard A2 Ar15 grip
So true! Why anybody still installs that thing on a new rifle is beyond me.

I have to add the non removeable carry handle AR uppers. Junk!
 
mattmiller (Robusto) said:
In basic I named mine "Lunch Box" because of the carry handle.
Man it would have been fun to go thru basic with your buddies. Seeing you suckas getting smoked would have been awesome!
 
Matt Rigsby said:
The Remington 870. I've owned 4 of them and they were all total crap.
The $180 Mossberg Maverick I had was a far better shotgun.
887 is 10k times worse than the 870. Never had one, BIL did for far too long.
 
I don't like the Sig Sauer P22X guns. I didn't find them to be amazingly accurate and the controls were put on there by someone without thumbs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top