felt recoil between jp lmos and nickel boron bcg

chef.hunter.elliott

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
187
Location
tulsa, ok
I see people running nickel boron bcg and people that praise the jp lmos bcg. Is there a huge difference in recoil impulse between these two? If one is so great then why run the other? Thanks guys.
 
Register to hide this ad
NB is just a slicker surface coating that could theoretically be run w/o lube or lubed very sparingly. The JP reduces the mass coming back as the gun is fired.
 
NiB does nothing to reduce recoil. It makes cleaning slightly easier and it is slicker than other metal treatments. So theoretically you could extend your service life with less maintenance.

If you coated your JP carrier with NiB you would have the cats meow. Don't thing I haven't thought about doing it. Turn around time is the inly thing stoppIng me.

I do run NiB coated Loki bolts in my JP carriers inside my Stag rifles. Those bolts clean up quick after a few trips through the sonic cleaner.
 
Yes the NiB has way less recoil... Just make sure whoever does it properly triangulates the coating with the bore axis or you cant really fell it. Most people don't know this so don't be surprised if you ask around and no one knows what your talking about
 
Makes since less mass less recoil. So why would u run a heavy buffer if your not trying to slow a cyclic rate down? Why run heavy on a semi?
 
spikes team and i think rob romero last year

lol,
You need to get out of Neo's chair; just because he learnt Kung-fu and drunken boxing in a 10sec download doesnt mean you can become a world class three gunner in two weeks by learnin on the internet.

Giving a elephant dung about this and that piece of equipment is not going to help you one bit, And might even turn you into a gear queer.

So whats it gonna be? You got horns, son?

:rofl:
 
A good comp is priority #1!!

A low mass op system is very nice, but not a HUGE game changer. Lots of good 3 gunners kick ass with good old "milspec" bolts.

That said, you get to a points and you are looking for absolutely every advantage you can get.
 
So why would u run a heavy buffer if your not trying to slow a cyclic rate down? Why run heavy on a semi?

I've talked to a few people that run them in fighting rifles because they like the harder "slam" forward into battery. I believe the theory is fewer out-of-battery failures to fire in dirty / adverse conditions. I don't know a good reason to argue with that.

Can't think of a reason to run one on a competition rifle though.
 
That makes sense that they would need something like that. but the most my rifle would go through is nothing remotely compared to what a battle rifle in very adverse conditions like sandstorms and such would go through. So that means a forward assist might not be a necessity on a competition rifle i guess.
 
Back
Top