Danny Glover has lost his mind

argyle64

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
1,077
Location
OKC
http://news.yahoo.com/lethal-weapon-actor-tells-students-second-amendment-intended-051717897.html

Actor and progressive political activist Danny Glover informed a group of students at a Texas A&M University-sponsored event that the Second Amendment was created to put down slave rebellions and subjugate Native Americans.

“I don’t know if you know the genesis of the right to bear arms,” Glover said on Thursday. “The Second Amendment comes from the right to protect themselves from slave revolts and from uprisings by Native Americans.”

“A revolt from people who were stolen from their land or revolt from people whose land was stolen from, that’s what the genesis of the Second Amendment is,” he added.

That theory that the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to put down slave rebellions was recently resurrected by bestselling author and radio host Thom Hartmann, who said Virginia wouldn’t ratify the Constitution without a guarantee that it would have some way to keep slaves in check.

Campus Reform, which broke the story, reports that the “Lethal Weapon” and “Predator 2″ star made the controversial statements at the sixth-annual Martin Luther King Breakfast on Texas A&M’s flagship campus in College Station. Other event sponsors include the office of the president and the athletic department.

At another point during the event, the award-winning actor called the United States “a material, a militaristic and, frankly â€" let’s call a spade a spade â€" a racist society.”

The San Francisco State University graduate (B.A., 1964) also pontificated professorially about the causes and effects of global warming. Later, he called the Occupy movement a “reimagining of democracy.”

An extensive video of Glover’s statements is available on YouTube.

A spokesperson for Texas A&M said that the administration had no prior knowledge that Glover would make such statements.

“I had no idea. We really didn’t know that topic was coming up,” Luke Altendorf, director of the school’s Memorial Student Center, told Campus Reform. “Someone was asking a question about activism. I think that’s where some of that came from.”

Altendorf would not discuss Glover’s compensation except to say that no student fees were used. Harry Belafonte and Angela Davis received $25,000 for speeches at past Martin Luther King Breakfast events, Campus Reform notes.

Altendorf championed the school’s decision to bring Glover and other controversial speakers to campus.

“We didn’t feel those speakers you are referring to are bad decisions on these topics because we want to foster discussion,” he told Campus Reform.

Members of a student group called the Texas Aggie Conservatives recorded the event for posterity.

The group has also created an online petition that protests a series of speaker choices that it calls politically biased.

“We expect President Loftin to stand by his commitment to diversity and fully support our efforts to bring in a conservative speaker to provide an alternative to Mr. Glover’s far left message” the group’s chairperson, Erik Schroeder, told Campus Reform.
 
Register to hide this ad
I just started watching predator 2. Seems ironic that someone that became famous and rich holding a gun is such a dbag about the 2nd amendment.
 
Well, respect is earned. Glover has not earned mine. He is however, entitled to his opinion no matter how misguided it may be.

So, he is exercising his 1st Amendment right to free speech as we use the 1st Amendment to petition to protect the 2nd Amendment from his and others inaccurate comments.

It's the circle of rights. :sarcastichand:
 
StealthESW said:
Well, respect is earned. Glover has not earned mine. He is however, entitled to his opinion no matter how misguided it may be.

So, he is exercising his 1st Amendment right to free speech as we use the 1st Amendment to petition to protect the 2nd Amendment from his inaccurate comments.

It's the circle of rights. :sarcastichand:
More like "It's the circle of wrongs."
 
StealthESW said:
Lol.

I was actually refering to how each right protects the others.
I knew that but I had to make a joke somehow. Or I could've said, "More like 'It's the circle of lefts'." Get it? Hahahahahahahaha!
 
Yet another Hollywood type that believes his job acting gives him incredible insight into epistemology and social philosophy.
 
Here's one of the original 1998 articles pushing Glover's theory:

http://www.saf.org/lawreviews/bogus2.htm

Note the author of that article's job history:

VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER, Washington, DC
National Advisory Panel, 1993-Present.

HANDGUN CONTROL, INC., Washington, DC
Board of Gov., 1992-93, Board of Directors, 1987-89.

THE CENTER TO PREVENT HANDGUN VIOLENCE, Washington, DC
Board of Directors, 1989-92.
 
Here is why this kind of rhetoric is bad:

http://americablog.com/2013/01/the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery.html

There’s a huge PR opportunity here. Painting the Second Amendment as a defense of racism & slavery is a nice way to rebrand the NRA types â€" both the organization itself and its most virulent supporters.

As Color Of Change has shown with its Trayvon-driven anti-ALEC campaign, racism is now a bridge too far for most Americans, and most people and corps will run these days when credibly painted as racist. In other words, people are always talking Second Amendment in terms favorable to the NRA. This is a way to change that discussion.
 
It's a disgusting thing to use one of our precious rights to try and destroy another. He should be ashamed of himself. Trying to push his agenda on impressionable young people.
 
Back
Top