Carbine length on 14.5" and 16" barrels - why?

samuelshoun

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
89
Location
Tulsa, OK
Been meaning to ask this a while now... Why do these exist? Why not just make them midlength? Is the higher gas pressure advantageous under adverse conditions? Better for full-auto, maybe?

For a civilian AR, carbine gas seems to me obsolete in 14.5" & 16" barrel lengths. But I see a ton of them being sold. What am I missing?
 
Register to hide this ad
The operating pressure is disadvantageous, and that's what spawned all the different heavy buffers and extractor enhancer thingies.
 
You're missing the "Mil-spec" factor. That factor sells countless millions of guns to people who will never shoot more than 1000 rounds in their entire lifetime.
 
Hmm... I guess "carbine" does sounds more badasser than lame-o "midlength" anyway. Plus I like my guns with MORE recoil!!

Anyway, thanks for confirming my suspicion. My guess is these are still "milspec" because military beaurocracy yada yada, and eventually the military will go to midlength? Or maybe they're using shorter barrels...
 
Weren't the original AR's issued to MIL in Vietnam 20" barrels? DId they have rifle length gas systems?
 
Just a rumor man. I only take pictures of them and apparently piss OSA guys off when I post them. :/
 
Back
Top