armaborealis said:I would log any C&R-eligible firearm even if you don't use your C&R FFL to acquire it. For example, say you go to a gun shop in SC and buy a Mosin Nagant (C&R eligible) and don't use your FFL -- you just get a NICS check and walk out like normal after doing the 4473. I'd still log the acquisition.
rotarymike said:Where is that requirement? I looked through all the regs BATFE sent me with my C&R and to me it reads that any firearm I use my C&R to obtain, must be logged. Firearms NOT purchased through the C&R should not need to be logged. Not being argumentative here, I'd like a reference to the requirement.
Reason I ask - when I got my C&R I had already had a Mauser for a while. Asked BATFE whether it needed to be logged or not (it was bought on a normal 4473) and they said no, that my 'collection' started when I got the C&R and only applied to C&R guns bought with the license.
"To sum up your two questions, every licensed collector must enter all acquisition of C&R firearms into
their A&D records because the firearm is a curio or relic and will be part of their collection or
possession. This is required even if their Federal fierarms license was not used to acquire the
firearm (see 27 CFR 478.125(f) and 18 U.S.C 923(g)(2)). The regulations also require that the
licensee enter all the appropriate information whenever a C&R firearm is disposed."