Recent content by RK3369

believe me, if you're talking about dealing with the government, 3 days is an "instant". They do nothing in 3 days, including adequate background checks.

ah yes.......... we can certainly depend on the government to protect us all.

'ya think? I'd rather depend on myself. Looks like I'd be just as well off anyhow.

you're right. I don't believe he's supportive of the 2A at all. From what I've seen, he goes right along with the anti gun line. I'm sure you did not influence his vote on that issue. Thanks for trying though. Although it appears that we have a lot of "staunch" defenders of the 2A here in SC...

In my limited experience, this is not typical. I can only assume they figured you were a hired gun from outside SC and perhaps weren't going to acknowledge the email thinking that perhaps you were ganging up on them from the NRA or some other interest group rather than a real SC voter. I did...

probably. Before that, somebody going to check their "crop" could just be in there carrying a gun and claim they were hunting. They probably wanted to carry the gun to make sure their pot was not being raided, but definitely didn't want to attract unnecessary attention. Now they can get them...

........or perhaps not, if they were there doing something they weren't supposed to be doing, thus making it harder for LEO to locate them if they weren't wearing orange. So, given that lawbreakers will likely not wear the orange attire to be in compliance, it's just another charge that LEO can...

The way it is written above, it says 'All persons............., not, "all persons while hunting............." so is it perhaps to require all persons to wear orange during hunting season on those lands whatever their purpose? Ex, guide, driver, etc???

Oh, well, if you can't take the guns away, why not go after anything else related to them..............

I believe it could be amended in committee and come out of committee, but then I think there would have to be some sort of compromise session between the house version and the senate version. but I guess the larger question is, what could be amended by the committee that would still allow...

I think It has to come out of committee with a recommendation to proceed by a certain date> If not, I believe it's dead for this session. It would then have to be reintroduced next session in the House, I believe. If it went to the Senate judiciary committee, the head of that committee is not in...

any update on this where this bill is in the senate?

I left Syracuse back in 2007 and have never regretted it. No GD snow to shovel here, temps are nice, folks are generally friendly, and they really do make it easy to enjoy your firearms down here compared to the Fascist State of NY and it's Fascist Governor Il Duce Cuomo. It's disgusting what...

most likely. I don't think the Senate will go with it.

You could be right. I did see a lot more of them after the change in the law allowing CC into bars. A lot of those are now gone. It wasn't as big an issue as the anti's made it seem. If you can pass a background check, what's the difference where you carry? It's only for self defense, not for...