Scope Lenses

TacticalTed.com

Fanatic
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
14
Originally posted on TacticalTed.com/blog

Scope Lenses ? Fully Coated, Multi Coated, What Does It All Mean?

Before you purchase that new scope, here are some terms you need to know. Scopes have coated lenses, fully coated lenses, multi-coated lenses, and fully multi-coated lenses. What do these terms mean and how do they differ?When light hits a glass surface not all of it passes through to the other side, some of it is reflected back off the lens surface and because of this, some of the light that would have traveled to the viewer?s eye is lost. This light loss occurs anywhere there is lens to air contact. An uncoated lens can lose around four percent of the light it comes in contact with. The more lenses in a scope, the more light is lost. In order to lessen this light loss, manufacturers apply anti-reflective coatings to lenses. If you look at a scope with coated lenses you will notice that the ocular (front) lens seems to have a slight color to it. It may appear blue, red, green, gold, etc. What you are seeing is the coating applied to the lens. When you read that an optic has coated lenses, it means that one or both sides of some (not necessarily all) of the lenses are coated with an anti-reflective coating.

The next step up is the scope with fully coated lenses. This means that all air to lens surfaces of the scope are coated. In theory, the scope with fully coated lenses should be the brighter of the two. Then we come to the scope with multi-coated lense/s. This means that at least one air to glass surface of one the scopes lenses has been coated with two or more layers of anti-reflective coating.

As we continue up the list of scope quality we come to the top of the line, the scope with fully multi-coated lenses, which simply means that all air to glass surfaces of each lens of the scope is coated with multiple layers of coating. This scope should be the brightest, all else being equal.

There are many types of lens coatings and some are better than others. Some lens coatings can be very expensive and are a large part of price you pay for more costly scopes. Is it worth the extra money? That is a very subjective question and can only be answered by the individual. Get a room full of hunters and you will never get them all to agree on an answer. The bottom line is: for some, the greater expense is worth it, for others it is not. It is all about perceived value, what you can afford, and are willing to pay for.
 

Cohiba

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
91
Keep in mind that the two differences is light gathering from a 200-2000 dollar score amount to about 10 additional minutes of light.
But I'd your hunting items during those minutes when your most likely to see the bug bucks.
 

PANZER22

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
307
Location
Goose Creek SC
TacticalTed.........The lens nearest to the eye on a scope is the ocular lens....The front lens is the objective lens

eyepiece [i?p?s]
the lens or system of lenses of a microscope (or telescope) nearest the user's eye, serving to further magnify the image produced by the objective. Called also ocular

Objective lens | Define Objective lens at Dictionary.com
dictionary.reference.com/browse/objective+lens objective lens. noun. the lens or system of lenses in a telescope or microscope that is nearest the object being viewed [syn: objective]
 

Latest posts

Top