Reply to my letter from Tim Scott

PCShogun

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
583
Location
Hanahan, SC
Reply to my letter from Tim Scott



"Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding any legislation or treaty that would ban civilian weapons. I certainly appreciate your input on this important issue and the opportunity to share my thoughts with you.

I have not seen a ban on a weapon that I agree with, and like you, I am an ardent supporter of an individual's right to possess and bear arms. This right is unequivocally protected by the Second Amendment and is a cornerstone of our democracy. As Americans, we have the right to defend ourselves, our families and our property, and the federal government should not interfere with this right. You can be assured that I remain steadfast in my commitment to defend and uphold this fundamental freedom and will keep your concerns in mind when considering pertinent legislation.

Again, thank you for sharing your perspective with me; I hope that you will continue to do so in the future. If I can ever be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my staff. "
 

fordnut

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
2,159
Location
Hanahan, SC
I got the same letter today...

I do know Tim was one of the few that voted against Obummer giving "Egrupt " the F-16's.

Steve
 

Lupinus

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
77
Someone should remind him we aren't a democracy [/wince]

Sorry, pet peeve
 

LiveFreeorDie

Well-Known Fanatic
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
185
Location
within range
Lupinus said:
Someone should remind him we aren't a democracy

Good point, and an error you would think a U.S. Senator would not make. But if he had said "Democratic Republic" (or the even more historical "Constitutional Republic") no one would know what he was talking about! I'm very concerned about the collective 'wisdom' of the 'masses' these days!
 

Latest posts

Top