rmc51
Well-Known Fanatic
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2021
- Messages
- 897
U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to ban on gun 'bump stocks'
- Thread starter rmc51
- Start date
rmc51
Well-Known Fanatic
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2021
- Messages
- 897
Rare Breed Triggers
Rare Breed Triggers are next, be readyRare Breed Triggers
That lawyer doesn't have much fight in him. My impression was that he sounds like a lawyer. Take that any way you wish to.
www.1911fanatics.com
"I would recommend that you guys, turn they in and not give-up ownership as this will be adjudicated by the courts."
I don't think that this is the hill you want to die on.
No surprise to me.
Figures. I really don't trust them, and haven't for a while now.
dennishoddy
Moderator
I knew that would happen. Bump stocks are not a functioning firearm nor a necessary part.
It doesn't fall under the 2nd Ammendment protections so SCOTUS refused to consider it.
I doubt you see SCOTUS take suppressors on either. Perhaps the law behind the government taxation, but not the actual suppressor. I love my suppressors and just don't understand the reasoning behind why we have to pay so much for them and get gubberment permission.
In Europe and Africa, you can buy them off the shelf for $50 bucks or so like a candy bar.
It doesn't fall under the 2nd Ammendment protections so SCOTUS refused to consider it.
I doubt you see SCOTUS take suppressors on either. Perhaps the law behind the government taxation, but not the actual suppressor. I love my suppressors and just don't understand the reasoning behind why we have to pay so much for them and get gubberment permission.
In Europe and Africa, you can buy them off the shelf for $50 bucks or so like a candy bar.
